“Podcasters have to grow up”

The words in the title are from a friend of mine who knows computing, imaging, video, film and audio. Smart guy whom I called with glee when I received my Edirol R1 — and called again with my profound disappointment. After we talked for awhile and I told him my tale of woe, his comment was, “podcasters have to grow up when it comes to what it takes to capture quality audio.”

He’s right. Today I returned the Edirol R1. Originally purchased for mobile podcasting, the amount of post-processing I had to perform on the file was too profound and time consuming to be useful. I tried everything: recording at multiple resolutions; buying two different types of microphones; talking at length with Edirol tech support; reading multiple articles online; trying a myriad of normalizing/compressing techniques after learning “what real sound engineers do”.  All to no avail.

I get great quality from my desktop setup (Audio Technica AT3035; M-Audio MobilePre; nice stand; Apple’s Garageband); which gives me surprisingly good results. Most times I can crank out a 10 minute podcast in an hour and a half (tweaking it; re-recording; adding music; outputting the file then transcoding it to mp3, etc). The kicker with the Edirol file? It took me about that SAME time to get the file sound level to be decently synchronous with the output from my desktop setup — and THEN I had to build the podcast for an hour and a half!

I’m not naive. I don’t expect that a $200 field mike and $450 field recording will rival a computer/desktop setup worth $3k or so. Still, it ‘felt’ like the sound quality was roughly half the quality which just wouldn’t work for me or for my bride (who wanted to perform field interviews with the setup).

So back it went and I’ll pay shipping and a 10% re-stocking fee.

Maybe not all is lost with the experience though. I’m thinking back to the days of desktop publishing where there was an explosion of fonts on a page. Really crappy design. All white space used. Violations of every known technique learned by paste-up artists and page layout experts for decades. I know that it was pretty painful for me to figure out how to produce professional looking publications from my desktop and I bought A LOT of books and wasted A LOT of prepress hours before I finally got a workflow going that consistently produced superior and repeatable results.

Guess I’ve got some work to do and some more investments to make with audio for this here podcasting thang…

INNOVATION: 940 Executives Surveyed — Apple, 3M, GE, Microsoft, and Sony are top five innovators.

Most of us know intrinsically that innovation drives sales. We also know that people are always on the hunt for better, cheaper, faster, and new ways of doing things.

I was never a fan of vinyl. It scratched and was noisy. When CD’s hit the scene, I began voraciously consuming music. Same thing with videotape (hated it) which is why I was such a fan of the cool, new LaserDisc (size of an LP vinyl record but was an optical medium for video) when it became the videophile medium of choice. It wasn’t until the very innovative DVD medium hit the mass market (and killed LaserDisc, by the way) that I became a rabid fan buying DVD delivered content.

The iPod innovation has taken my use of audio to the next level. Not only am I consuming significantly more music, audio books, podcasts and more…I’m now doing my own podcast content! The podcast phenomena is a direct result of the innovation of Apple (and the work of the RSS god Dave Winer along with the popularizing of it by Adam Curry). With the rebirth of the iMac in the late 90′s (think candy colored iMac’s) along with the iPod, Apple has innovated their way out of being the moot point of the computer industry.

Business leaders are getting the message. Innovation drives top-line growth.

This study (link is a PDF) by the Boston Consulting Group, is about their second annual global survey of senior executives on innovation and the innovation-to-cash (ITC) process. This process covers the many interrelated activities involved in turning ideas into economic returns. It goes well beyond new-product development, to include such issues as portfolio management, life cycle management, and organization.

A total of 940 executives, representing 68 countries and all major industries, participated. Their executive summary highlights some of the top-level findings from the survey. The rest of the report explores the implications of the findings and provides more detail. Key findings in the study include:

  • Seventy-four percent of the executives surveyed said that their companies will increase spending on innovation in 2005, up from 64 percent in 2004.
  • Almost 90 percent of the executives surveyed said that generating organic growth through innovation has become essential for success in their industry.
  • Less than half of the executives surveyed said that they were satisfied with the financial returns on their investments in innovation.
  • Executives ranked Apple, 3M, GE, Microsoft, and Sony as the most innovative companies. Apple rose to the top spot from number five last year.
  • Globalization and organizational issues were cited as two of the biggest challenges facing many companies in 2005.

Each of us has evolutionary ideas of how to innovative our products, services or even our own personal brand equity. What new ideas and innovations — either evolutionary or truly revolutionary — are *you* bringing to market for your company *or* for yourself?

CTD podcast for June 12, 2005

Today’s show covers MNSpeak.com (Minnesota Speak); Eric Rice and an “Edirol update”; PodcastMN.com (shortlist of Minnesota podcasters); and my friend George and some stuff around audio streaming and recording.

Listen to or download the podcast…

A patent that’ll kill podcasting?

I’m not a lawyer, but a buddy of mine sent me this link with a “Hmmm….” attached.

I did a “Hmmm…wha!?!” too when I thought about what Apple is doing with iTunes/iPod (and soon podcasting) and whether or not this patent from Command Audio will have any impact. On their site it states in part (I’ve bolded in blue the most germane part):

Command Audio’s patents cover the audio aspects of consumer devices and services that store broadcast media for playback at the consumer’s convenience.  Personal Video Recorders (PVRs) and the “on-demand” services they enable are presently the best-known embodiments of this technology.  These patents predate the development of the PVR market and cover a wide range of broadcast transmission technologies, devices and systems that incorporate on-demand functionality, an essential component of PVRs.

Below is one of several claims in Command Audio’s patents:

USPTO PATENT NO. 6,330,334, CLAIM 44:

A receiver comprising:

  • a television tuner;
  • a controller coupled to the television tuner and which provides audio from a signal received at the television tuner, wherein the audio is carried in an audio or video portion of television signals received at the tuner;
  • a memory coupled to the controller and which stores the audio;
  • a user interface coupled to the controller and which provides a menu; and
  • an output device coupled to the controller and which outputs the stored audio in response to a selection from the menu, wherein the stored audio has a designation associated with the menu.

That last bullet sure looks to me like an iPod connected to a computer with audio managed by iTunes.

If that’s not bad enough, Command Audio says their patents are relevant to any device that filters and caches broadcast audio for later access by a user, for example:

  • Radios with digital storage
  • PVRs (Personal Video Recorders), including cable and satellite set top boxes
  • HMGs (Home Media Gateways), including PCs with PVR capability.

Will these patents be enforceable for, say, an iPod that can record satellite radio? How come we haven’t seen Microsoft, HP and other PVR vendors getting sued for patent infringement?

According to Command Audio’s News section, in January of this year the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has ruled against Sony Electronics, Inc. (NYSE: SNE), rejecting Sony’s contentions that Command Audio purposely misled the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in the early 1990s while seeking its foundation on-demand media patent (U.S. Patent No. 5,406,626). Consequently, Command Audio’s lawsuit against Sony for infringing two related Command Audio patents will continue to move forward. In June 2004 the Court ruled summarily that Sony had been infringing at least one of those patents, U.S. Patent No. 6,330,334.

Videoblog…no….podcast…hey, it’s both!

One of the key players in Web 2.0 is a guy named Eric Rice. I came across his site, Audioblog.com, right after I started my blog last December. I wanted to be able to stream audio and he had video to boot. His offering is *very* affordable, brain-dead-simple to use and attractively delivered (as Flash content) wrapped in graphics and animated buttons/sliders.

Eric hits my blog: After my podcast yesterday (which admittedly had audio too low in volume but I understand what happened now), Eric found my Edirol R1 review and came “back at me” with a kinda videoblog and kinda podcast in this post. The fun thing is to have a guy I’ve observed from afar — who “gets it”, is plugged in and has already built an enabling technology people are scrambling to use — pay any attention to some guy up here in the Northland dipping his toe in the Web 2.0 water.

Here’s the other cool thing: Eric came back at me with his Archos video player (that doubles as an audio recorder) which I’d never even considered before buying my Edirol! (Can you say, “EBay”?).

What happened today is one of the absolute best parts of the blogging/videoblogging/audioblogging/podcasting <insert your buzzword here> phenomena: the exchange of ideas that build upon one another; the connections that are made; the fun richness of these experiences and the ability for more of us to communicate than ever before.

CTD podcast for June 7, 2005

A 10 minute podcast discussing my new toy: the Edirol R1, portable WAVE/MP3 Recorder/Player…a perfect device for mobile podcasting.

This is quite a nice, small, compact field recorder that I’m just beginning to understand. Not yet fully pleased with the results I’ve achieved, but the problem is not with the hammer…it’s the carpenter that needs more experience!

Still, I can sense the possibilities that a device of this quality and capability will bring to mobile field recording. Can’t wait to get better at using it and the results it’s sure to bring.

Listen to or download the podcast…

Apple on Intel

Since Google News has 1,048 articles about Apple’s intention to support Intel and 1,398 blog posts on Technorati about it, I feel compelled to weigh in with my opinion (like anyone will notice!).

This is a good thing. Faster chips. Cooler chips. Different devices (maybe a tablet?). The opportunity for Apple to some day license OS X to all comers when the timing is right. Perhaps the ability to run binaries — with the acceleration of emulation like Apple’s Rosetta and the open source WINE — will be a beautiful thing possibly allowing the running of Windows applications on Mac OS X. (Great editor’s note on MacCentral that is a brief yet balanced analysis of this announcement).

One troubling thing….

When I told my wife — who owns 7 Mac’s in her small business and we have 4 at home — about the rumors of Apple on Intel being true she said, “Well then let’s not buy any Mac’s until they have the new chips.” Yikes. It’ll be interesting to see how they can avoid the Osborne effect.

CTD podcast for June 5, 2005

Today’s 10 minute show discusses the Griffin radioSHARK, an AM/FM antenna that connects to USB on your PC/Mac for time-shift recording of live radio. A couple of recorded snippets are included so you can hear the quality.

The show ends with a brief overview of This Week in Tech (TWIT) from the former show staff of The Screen Savers on TechTV (learn more at www.twit.tv).

Download the MP3 File

Backpack: Web service online organizer

Can’t tell you how often I come across cool new web services when surfing blogs — even when I end up thinking that it’s only marginally useful. Tonight I was at 43 Folders and read a post about a hosted web service called BackpackIt and checked it out.

Though their free service (5 pages, 10 reminders) is interesting, the paid service adds reasonable amounts of pages and storage ($5/month (20 pages, 40 MB disk space for images/files, 100 reminders), $9/month (100 pages, 100 MB disk space for images/files, 200 reminders), or $19/month (500 pages, 250 MB disk space for images/files, 300 reminders)). Still, with my cable modem access ($45 per month), web site ($9 per month), blog ($15 per month), and audioblog streaming service ($5 per month), that’s $74 per month for what I consider to be basic stuff. Now add, say, another $9 per month and a service like this had better be REALLY useful or needed before I’d cough up more dough.

It’s nice that one can password protect pages…but my blog provider (Typepad) let’s me setup unlimited blogs with storage for photos, etc., and no “page count” required — and each blog could be password protected! So what sets these guys apart from a blog provider?

Reminders. This is what is particularly cool in my view since you can have reminders or ticklers show up on an aggregated dashboard or be sent to you via email or SMS. I still think that — if I really need a reminder — I have my calendar on my Blackberry that works just fine, thank you (but of course, that would require every to-do be entered twice). Maybe PDA support and sync’ing is required?

Here’s another thing I struggle with when considering any hosted web service offering: Is it secure? Will people use it? Can I easily aggregate and connect it with other stuff internally and externally in our organization? Even with a personal site such as Backpack (they have a commercial project management offering called Basecamp) this is an issue.

In its current form, I’d say Backpack is a stretch for anyone that would or could sign up for a blogging provider with unlimited blogs (heck…I could setup a blog per subject and allow guest authors, etc., and do almost everything Backpack does without paying more money).