<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Shift in Value Exchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iconnectdots.com/2006/10/global_shift_in.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iconnectdots.com/2006/10/global_shift_in.html</link>
	<description>Guidance, Insight and Ideas in a Time of Accelerating Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Plougmann</title>
		<link>http://iconnectdots.com/2006/10/global_shift_in.html/comment-page-1#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Plougmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iconnectdots.com.s11974.gridserver.com/2006/10/global-shift-in-value-exchange.html#comment-944</guid>
		<description>I suspect governments are looking into virtual economies because they look a bit like frequent flyer mile schemes - a huge economy with a virtual currency which is already regarded as taxable income in many countries.

As for open source, I certainly hope that the &quot;commons&quot; approach will prevail and that benefit derived does not become equated with taxable income. That is, benefiting from free software (and hence others&#039; work) should be regarded in line with the benefit you get from, say, admiring impressive architecture when moving around a city.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect governments are looking into virtual economies because they look a bit like frequent flyer mile schemes &#8211; a huge economy with a virtual currency which is already regarded as taxable income in many countries.</p>
<p>As for open source, I certainly hope that the &#8220;commons&#8221; approach will prevail and that benefit derived does not become equated with taxable income. That is, benefiting from free software (and hence others&#8217; work) should be regarded in line with the benefit you get from, say, admiring impressive architecture when moving around a city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

