Time: Bloggers react to *It’s all about You*

Techmeme_2I probably shouldn’t be stunned that the LARGEST number of links and blog discussions I’ve yet seen on Techmeme were when Time magazine set their "Person of the Year: You".

For most of us in the Web 2.0, internet and participation culture (the basis of my Rise of the Participation Culture report), most of what this article said was obvious since we’re living it. The important thing, however, is that the mainstream press is bringing it to the attention of the masses who are still amazingly clueless.

A year and a half ago I was talking to a C-level executive at a company about blogging, podcasting and virtual worlds. I admitted that the virtual world thing was a little far out…but then he looked at me and said, "What’s blogging?" This man headed marketing.

It wasn’t until BusinessWeek did a cover story on Second Life that senior executives and my close colleagues and friends stopped looking at me like I was some technoweenie goofball out of touch with reality or far too strategic to be practical.

To see participants (i.e., bloggers) participate in the Time magazine discussion seems appropriate, but if you read some of the perspectives it proves how people leap into the discussion and mold, shape and change public discourse. At least I hope the Time magazine folks are reading bloggers writings as I have. Some…not all…of bloggers’ perspectives have deepened my understanding of what Time published.

Friday evening I was at a gathering where two people (my wife was one of them) vociferously railed against the alleged inaccuracies of Wikipedia and "all those bloggers whose opinions I don’t care about" intimating that all of us out here were just ill informed spewers of opinion with little regard to facts.

Others there didn’t seem to see much import to the whole participation thing. During the discussion, I politely pointed all those places where I begged to differ, but realized that these people were still up in the stands watching (instead of on the field playing like we who participate) and are distracted and only peripherally watching the game. Unfortunately, these are people who are involved in trend, marketing, product and service ideations (though all 40+ so maybe it was age-related) and should’ve been right next to me pushing on the membrane of the future instead of fearing it or minimizing its import.

So it’s good to see bloggers react like this but then all of us — those who "get it" and those yet to — need to understand that 98% of the world is still unaware, doesn’t care, sees it as noise and inefficiency instead of what it is: connecting humankind to the next level of social, fun, creativity, problem solving and efficiency. Just like the train, car, and airplane transported our bodies, the internet is transporting our minds.

Mall of America and Ecommerce

My bride and I shop Amazon, iTunes Music Store, Costco and many other online retailers…so why are we slogging through the crowds at the Mall of America?

We want to see, touch and feel. Have an experience. Find bargains ( her anyway).  Have a fun lunch. People watch.

Visual merchandising and retail product placement is an optimized art and adept at playing to our emotions. I find myself much more objective and detached when buying online and thus less inclined to impulse buy. All the personalization and recommendation of world-class online retailing can’t hold a candle to effective, meatspace retailing…yet.

Yugma Launches: Free Web Conferencing

Yugma
Minnesota-based Yugma has officially launched with their free Web conferencing software. If you are actively online and using any of the collaboration, social or other participatory Web applications — or hold meetings where any participants need to see what you’re doing and may not have your applications — there have been few, Web 2.0-ish ways of connecting with others quickly, seamlessly and for free.

I’ve extensively used Webex , Go-to-Meeting, Placeware (now Microsoft Live Meeting) and other solutions over the years. They’re expensive and few are truly cross-platform. As a Mac user, it’s always bugged me that I could watch Web conferences but had to grab my PC in order to host them (disclaimer: I acted as a consultant for Yugma for four months this year).

Since all of we full internet participants are using wiki’s, collaboration apps like Foldera, Basecamp or Central Desktop — or many of us are active Skype users and REALLY would like to show stuff from our computer to others while on a Skype conference call — Yugma adds a robust, fast, seamless and easy way to share your desktop with others.

Yugma1_1
Much to my delight they’ve executed on an idea to build and deliver a Yugma widget! If you have a blog, are on a collaboration site, have a company intranet or your own Web site, you can now grab and add a button to allow anyone you’re collaborating with to leap onto a Yugma session with you in about a minute.

Their Java application ensures that Windows, Mac and soon Linux users will be able to collaborate and share whatever each type of user happens to have on their respective desktops or are running as applications. The user interface is solid, they’ve incorporated all the tools you’ll need, and have a premium version if you need lots of participants, scheduling or other premium features.

As more of us globally are connected via the ‘net and collaborating or interacting with people increasingly geographically disbursed (or, God forbid, these folks aren’t coming to the office due to pandemic flu, terrorist attack or natural disasters), solutions like Yugma will be absolutely critical to our ability to work and communicate.

The Yugma team is one of the most dedicated and hard working I’ve worked with for a long time and this application has been several years in the making. Do yourself a favor and check it out…it’s free and I’ll bet you’ll find a need to use it in the next several days.

Internet Anonymity

After yesterday’s Google post about them in a position for mass harvesting of data that can be monetized and/or learned from, I had an interesting experience today that’s illustrative of how anonymous we are — or aren’t — today on the ‘net.

Now that more of us are participating online, we’re leaving bread crumb trails all over the place. If you blog, are in social networks with public displays of information, or comment authentically, you’re leaving shreds of yourself all over the ‘net.

Case in point was someone performing mischief on a site where I’m posted. The interesting thing is that the wiki keeps a history of every IP address where an edit originated (similar to what Wikipedia does and where Adam Curry was busted editing his bio and a local Minnesota politician his bio…among other people who’ve done the same).

I figured it was someone else on the wiki list so I did a geolocated IP lookup of the IP address and discovered it originates in New York State and it displayed the actual city within it. Next I looked at that same IP address and the other edits that had occurred in the wiki history section and narrowed the possible field down to three other bloggers. Then I went to those three blogs and lo-and-behold…one guy blogs from his home in that exact city in New York.

This took less than ten minutes. Even though more and more of us have our IP addresses doled out by ISP’s that show the IP address is in Reston, VA or some such centralized location, the availability of geolocation databases will undoubtedly become more transparent unless Congress enacts legislation. (Check yours here and also notice that, amusingly, “address” is misspelled “adress” in the URL…but it works and should show you your city, etc.).

Of course, the Federal government, law enforcement, and undoubtedly a host of commercial companies can buy these or have these databases just like they can acquire access to our complete, unadulterated credit profile. With the present rate of storing clickstream data and all the world’s knowledge, if you’re internet active and participatory you’ll probably end up being a good chunk of a googol of data accessible to those who want to know about you, advertise to you or find you.

Google Patent Search = Free Ideas for Google?

Gpt
Thinking about innovating? Maybe you’re a Web application startup and think you have the next big idea? Until now, your choice in figuring out if someone has already patented your big idea has pretty much boiled down to hiring a patent attorney, paying for an exhaustive search, get legal interpretation on what’s possible and then file your own patent if warranted.

While much of that legal work won’t go away, Google’s launch of a Patent Search beta goes a long way toward making the patent process just a tad bit more transparent — and holds the promise of being an extremely empowering tool for understanding what intellectual property already exists.

I’ve written twice before (here and here) about Nathan Myhrvold’s Intellectual Ventures…an organization seemingly trying to “corner the market” on the most likely and viable patentable ideas in order to build a portfolio of licensable patents (every cell of my being rails against that, by the way).

Here’s the possible “gotcha” with Google’s new “Global Database of Ideas” patent search offering and reveals yet another part of their strategy to infiltrate every corner of the Web and monetize every possible data stream.

[Read more...]

Traveling…

Traveling today as I’m working with a fun, social site startup that you’re going to hear alot about…be back Thursday.

Design Matters. Design Adds Value.

9093
So often I work with director-level to senior executives on product ideation (focused brainstorming) and form always takes a back seat to function. If it’s software, the data model and architecture gets 80% of the attention and human factors work (the user interface) gets 20% of the effort.

I’ve worked at companies where the entire development organization — almost at the last minute — says in meetings as the ship date approaches, “…and then we probably should get moving on the user interface” as though the part of the product IN THE USERS’ FACE AND WHAT THEY’LL USE DAILY is some sort of afterthought!

You’ve also probably purchased products that you wish had gone just a little bit further with product quality. A case in point is my purchase of several headphones to use with Skype. Most are in the $40 range and — after going through three sets with twisty cords and crappy design — I finally spent $80 for a high end Logitech model. Great design, has its own case, and I delight every time I open the case and use the headset.

I love metaphors. When I talk about design importance things like, “…and if design didn’t matter in publishing, we’d all be reading courier font text on a white page” or “if design was left up to automotive engineers, they’d be stunned as to why someone would want that good car in blue with a Bose radio instead of focusing on the engine and drive train.” But I’m also 100% aware that fabulous design on poorly engineered products fail just as fast if not faster.

The key is balance.

[Read more...]

Wikia Free Hosting: The First of Many Things Free?

Wikia_logo
Wikia just announced free, open serving and "free content for all." If this was just another free site of some kind — instead of something setup by arguably the quintessential model for open content, Wikipedia — I’d not be so enthused or intrigued. But Jimmy Wales (head of Wikia) has done it once before on a massive scale and perhaps he’ll do it again?

Can’t find the article right now and don’t have the time (am jammin’ before heading to a charity dinner this evening) but I recall the cacophony of voices insisting that Wales monetize the enormous traffic from Wikipedia since the site was receiving something like four billion pageviews per month. If he took advertising, it would dwarf most media properties.

Of course, Wales knew intrinsically that such a move would destroy Wikipedia and take away the very energy and effort all the co-owners of Wikipedia (i.e., all of us) would feel about this global phenomena. He’s made it clear in interviews that Wikia was his vehicle to monetize the expertise he and his team have developed with building Wikipedia.

Who but Wales might know how to deliver a scalable, free, ad supported model that relies on the collective input of many? I’m going to invest a fair amount of time in understanding their approach and offer, but the tour looks graphically boring and the categories for an openserver instance too limiting (just tried to open one for a group I’m involved in and none of the categories work!!).

So many A-list bloggers and podcasters have wondered out loud about mobile phones (and even cars) being advertiser supported. I scratch my head over that but who knows? If this model works, could it be the first mass advertising model that allows affinity groups to be self-supporting? Will people really step up and generate content? It’s really quite thought provoking. 

Assembling a Rich Internet Application

Mr
After my rant yesterday, I’m realizing how incredibly close we are to significantly greater capability to have we run-of-the-mill, non-programmers assemble and deliver our own rich internet applications.

Remember Tom Cruise in Minority Report? Everyone always points to the RFID-like recognition the advertisement had of him as he ran from the cops (the ad greeted him by name). What I recall is when he was researching data in real-time by manipulating it in space with his hands. THAT is what I hope to have next year: a page layout-like ability to place images, text, and chunks of functionality into a seamless whole.

Let’s take a look at where we are right now:

  • Portal applications like Pageflakes, NetVibes, Protopage and others allow drag-n-drop of RSS-fed news and content as well as nice chunks of functionality like weather, time, search, movie listings and more. These are primarily personal portals…though Pageflakes allows the assemblage of public pages
  • Mashups are exploding in popularity. I haven’t checked until this evening (received an email from a friend exploring building a mashup application) and I was stunned with the huge array of them at ProgrammableWeb.

All of this is made possible by the accelerating number of Web-based, hosted applications that have exposed their inner workings with an Application Programming Interface (API).

What’s missing from all of this?

[Read more...]

Suite of Web Apps for Normal Humans

Webshow_1 These people sure look happy with something they’re doing online, don’t they? Maybe they’re using an easy-to-use, configure and run suite of mission-critical Web applications? They can’t be because none really exist!

I go back-n-forth being excited by the profound ease-of-use and focused Web 2.0 applications and the nearly 140,000 open source projects out there…and being pissed off that all this stuff is STILL too hard for the average human to install, configure or assemble into a whole solution.

Don’t believe me that this is still too hard? Before I explain further, let’s pretend that you’re NOT one of the hundreds of people I’ve interacted with over the years at organizations, small to midsize businesses and even individuals who’ve never installed server-centric applications, don’t know what PHP/Ajax or dotnet is, have never heard of Web 2.0/web services/service oriented architectures, and couldn’t tell you if the internet is a circuit or packet switching network. NOR DO THEY CARE.

These people know that their publications are downtrending. That their user base is scrambling for more content delivery via the Web. Or that some kind of Web asset needs to be delivered so that they can serve the needs of their constituents, customers or prospects.

[Read more...]