Let’s (Not!) Play Comcast Monopoly

ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION TV CONSUMERS? If you are, then you have GOT TO SEE the anti-competitive, monopolistic, anti-internet moves that Comcast is making. If you’re not, OPEN YOUR EYES AND START SCREAMING at your Congresspeople and Comcast themselves.

I didn’t fly off the handle and get really steamed today just because…it was this tweet from the guy that invented the World Wide Web, Tim Berners Lee, and it was a link to this page at Marketwatch. Seems that Level 3 Communications, one of the biggest backbone providers on earth, today released a statement about a MAJOR move by Comcast to put a big ‘ole “Collect $200″ every time an internet TV company passes “Go!”:

On November 19, 2010, Comcast informed Level 3 that, for the first time, it will demand a recurring fee from Level 3 to transmit Internet online movies and other content to Comcast’s customers who request such content. By taking this action, Comcast is effectively putting up a toll booth at the borders of its broadband Internet access network, enabling it to unilaterally decide how much to charge for content which competes with its own cable TV and Xfinity delivered content. This action by Comcast threatens the open Internet and is a clear abuse of the dominant control that Comcast exerts in broadband access markets as the nation’s largest cable provider.

Are you serious Comcast? I truly hope that all the big kids with really deep pockets line up against you with their Howitzers. Maybe you’re itchin’ for a fight and methinks you’re gonna get one. Since you’ve got such little value-add or customer loyalty (I’d switch in a nanosecond if Qwest would get their sh*t together and drop fiber to my house which is only 1,000 feet away now) that I’d bet most people could care less if you tanked.

I’ve been writing about Comcast’s monopoly moves for a loooong time here and another site I run called Minnov8. See thisthis, this, this, this and this for more if you’re interested (and yes, there are even more posts).

Somehow this company thinks that THEY OWN the internet connection in to your (and my) house. That they get to control what comes over that pipe and that they should be able to charge Hulu, Apple, Google, Boxee, Revision3 or anyone who wants to deliver video content that somehow competes with what they offer.

I don’t care how much Comcast whines about the volume of streaming video bits that people are supposedly downloading. EVERYTHING COMCAST IS DOING IS ALL ABOUT PROTECTING THEIR MORE THAN $2B IN REVENUES FROM CABLE TV and not what they claim all the time: “Oh…it’s all about network management.” Again I call “bullshit” since Comcast is building out HUGE STORAGE CENTERS in Colorado, Minneapolis/St. Paul and Philadelphia so they clearly don’t want any of these other providers to get a foothold before they bring these centers fully online.

If anyone (especially someone representing Comcast in any way) tells you that this isn’t all about Comcast-protecting-Comcast they’re full of sh*t. Also, please oh please don’t comment with one of those, “But it’s good for the consumer” lines of crap. It’s not. It’s all about competition and let’s see if our paid-for new Congresspeople let the free market rein or if they protect their pals at Comcast.

You know what Comcast? I’ll bring over whatever bits I want to and I’ll pay you for your dumb pipe. That said, I really don’t want your crappy cable TV, your weak xFinity service or your on-demand that takes minutes to come up while your worthless and noisy previews run in the background. Your Scientific Atlanta DVR boxes are a joke and are worse than TiVO was 10 YEARS AGO; your on-demand pales in comparison to Netflix, AppleTV, GoogleTV, Boxee, PlexApp, Hulu…shall I go on?; and I’m sick of paying for TV that I don’t watch but have no choice in taking so you can promise households to ESPN and others.

Wow…I had no idea I was so pissed off at Comcast but there it is. What are YOU going to do or say or are you just going to lie there eating chips figuring someone else will figure it out?

Western Digital Portable HDs Are Too Fragile

A word of caution to those of you moving around with small portable hard drives: they are extremely fragile and you could lose all of your data….easily. In addition, some of these drives are more fragile than others since their manufacturers have taken shortcuts to make them smaller than competitors portable drives.

My wife carried around a portable, 1 terabyte hard drive. On it were redundant, backed up files (480GB worth and about 478GB she already has on another drive) but also contained a directory of images she’d taken at a European trade show. In its soft case, it slipped from her grasp about two feet from the floor and subsequently wouldn’t mount on her computer desktop.

Fearing the worse, I began diagnostics on it and was able to see it as attached storage and determine that the read/write head wasn’t doing any damage to the disks themselves. None of my recovery programs would work though—and professional data recovery starts at $695 and can run to $1,995 (from Kroll OnTrack 5 minutes from our offices)—so I tried other recovery attempts.

This portable hard drive is the Western Digital (WD) 1TB My Passport, now available at Costco for $129. Apparently to make their portable hard drives smaller than the competition, WD took a shortcut and has taken to soldering the USB connector directly to the controller board on the drive. What this means is that I couldn’t do what I’ve done in the past with other portable drives: pop open the case, take the drive out, and plug it in to my desktop tower (or even to an external case) and bypass what is likely a broken USB connection.

My only other options were to spend what would likely be ~$1,000 to recover my wife’s photos or to try just one more recovery method.

Since I had a desktop external 1TB hard drive I could use to recover the files using DDRescue, I started that block-by-block copying process the next morning (Friday). That afternoon I talked to a buddy of mine who runs service for a large retailer and mentioned I was three hours in to the process. He asked me to place my hand on the external hard drive to which the data was being copied. “Damn!“, I exclaimed, “It is very hot!” His response to me was, “At the rate of recovery and the amount of data on your diskit will take 10 days to recover but you’ll burn up your hard drive before the weekend is out.

Besides the knowledge they have of recovery, it turns out the pros have very expensive recovery drives that are cooled and run thousands apiece. “Don’t be a tightwad. Spend the money Borsch” was his parting advice.

That’s my cautionary tale to you today if you’re considering owning one of these portable drives (or already do). Even if you’re rigorous about backing up, if you’re enroute to the place where you do backup and drop this drive before you have a chance to do so (especially one of these WD drives) you can kiss your data or many hundreds of dollars goodbye.

Google Settles Buzz Class-Action Lawsuit

Just received an email from Google about the class-action lawsuit settlement regarding privacy breaches caused by the Google Buzz rollout:

Google rarely contacts Gmail users via email, but we are making an exception to let you know that we’ve reached a settlement in a lawsuit regarding Google Buzz, a service we launched within Gmail in February of this year.

Shortly after its launch, we heard from a number of people who were concerned about privacy. In addition, we were sued by a group of Buzz users and recently reached a settlement in this case.

The settlement acknowledges that we quickly changed the service to address users’ concerns. In addition, Google has committed $8.5 million to an independent fund, most of which will support organizations promoting privacy education and policy on the web. We will also do more to educate people about privacy controls specific to Buzz. The more people know about privacy online, the better their online experience will be.

Just to be clear, this is not a settlement in which people who use Gmail can file to receive compensation. Everyone in the U.S. who uses Gmail is included in the settlement, unless you personally decide to opt out before December 6, 2010. The Court will consider final approval of the agreement on January 31, 2011. This email is a summary of the settlement, and more detailed information and instructions approved by the court, including instructions about how to opt out, object, or comment, are available at http://www.BuzzClassAction.com.

——————————————————————–
This mandatory announcement was sent to all Gmail users in the United States as part of a legal settlement and was authorized by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Google Inc. | 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway | Mountain View, CA 94043

What? No compensation? Dang-it…