Why This MICHELIN® Tire Promo is Essentially a Scam
In August I purchased four MICHELIN® brand tires for my 2013 Toyota Prius Persona. This is a car my air-traveling wife hardly drove and has only 18,XXX miles on the odometer. As such, its tires are ones I could have easily driven for another 10,000 or more miles but, since I’ll be driving it to California in the next few months and will be putting on a lot of miles once I’m there, I wanted new tires.
Fortunately there was a $70 rebate on the 60,000-mile rated MICHELIN tires and service for which I spent nearly $800 on (see the screenshot about the rebate). Though I absolutely detest rebates, mainly since companies make it very hard to comply with all the instructions in the hope they’ll fulfill as few rebates as possible, I am quite meticulous on how I apply for them to ensure I’m complying with instructions and thought this would be seamless and easy. After all, MICHELIN is a major company and is (I thought) above the plaid-sportcoat-like behaviors of other companies who try to block and make rebate redemption difficult enough that the vast majority of consumers find it more bother than its worth and stop pursuing the rebate as soon as push-back by the “fulfillment centers” occurs.
That said, readers of this blog know I *deeply hate* rebates, unless they’re the “taken at the checkout” kind which gives a discount immediately. Consumers hating-rebates-backlash is the primary reason why Best Buy began eliminating rebates entirely in 2005 since most are as close to scams as these companies can away with and not be stopped by the Federal Trade Commission or Congress.
In my view rebates like this one are scams since they prey on the likelihood that only 21.1% of total sales or 67.6% of incremental sales from people successfully submit information to receive the rebate or they mail in the original receipt and then get a letter saying something like, “We never received your receipt. Please send another” knowing that the consumer likely doesn’t have a copy, can’t get one, or deems it not worthy of the effort.
See more on my posts A Nikon example of why I *hate* rebates and Nikon fills rebate….but how? or read The Great Rebate Runaround in Bloomberg BusinessWeek which said this back in 2005 of rebate redemption amounts:
In November 2005, BusinessWeek estimated a return rate of 60 percent. Some estimates have been as low as 2%. For example, nearly half of the 100,000 new TiVo subscribers in 2005 did not redeem their $100 rebates, allowing the company to keep $5,000,000 in additional profit.
It’s that throwing obstacles in the way of getting one’s legitimate rebate which is why I believe this MICHELIN® tire promotion rebate is essentially a scam since I complied with 100% of the instructions for submission and never, ever should have received a follow-up email requesting “…a little more information.”
But it’s not just me. Many others have viewed rebates as a “scam” and this crap by manufacturers goes back a long time as this 2003 Slate article on The Great Rebate Scam illustrates.
So what obstacles and barriers did MICHELIN toss in my way and why do I think this is an obvious effort to place a roadblock in the way of me claiming a legitimate rebate in the hope I’ll back-off and not pursue it?
As mentioned above, I meticulously provided the documentation requested initially when I submitted for the Michelin rebate on the Tire Fulfillment Center website as instructed. Though I wasn’t all that surprised, the Michelin “Tire Fulfillment Center” sent me an email late yesterday (over a month after I submitted on their website, I might add) asking for exactly the same information which I submitted on their website:
WTF? After submitting the rebate information in August on their website and uploading the receipt you see below — which again, already is, “…legible copy of your receipt…” and is, “…showing the name and address of the dealer where your tire purchase was made, the name of the person who purchased the tires, the tire brand, model, & size, and quantity of tires purchased” — they have the audacity to ask for it again (key information has been blacked-out for this blog post).
So this morning I created a PDF with a cover letter, a copy of their email, another copy of the receipt showing all of the information they asked for, and emailed it to them as requested.
To ensure they received it I also faxed it to them and a return receipt from our online faxing service was sent to me about an hour ago.
Gee…should I also do the third option of snail-mailing it to them? While they could claim that they never received the email or the fax machine was out of paper and someone inadvertenly unplugged the machine wiping its memory with my fax in it, I could print it out and send it certified mail so I’d obtain a signature of the person who received it too.
See why I think this is a scam and why I will never, ever buy another MICHELIN tire again for any of the cars we own?
Instead, I’m writing this post and will be posting it on my Facebook page and tweeting it. Then I’ll send it to the Federal Trade Commission and Senators Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar. Then I’ll post it to MICHELIN’s Facebook page so maybe, just maybe, they’ll stop delaying and erecting barriers to a promotion that should be done in good faith.
About Steve Borsch
Connecting the Dots Podcast
Podcasting hit the mainstream in July of 2005 when Apple added podcast show support within iTunes. I'd seen this coming so started podcasting in May of 2005 and kept going until August of 2007. Unfortunately was never 'discovered' by national broadcasters, but made a delightfully large number of connections with people all over the world because of these shows. Click here to view the archive of my podcast posts.